Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=696249 --- Comment #6 from Martin Gieseking <martin.gieseking@xxxxxx> 2011-04-27 09:13:57 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > Kupfer's licence is GPLv3+ Yes, sorry, I looked into the wrong COPYING (data/art/COPYING). BTW, extras/kupfer_provider.py also refers to GPLv2+ in its header. Anyway, we have a multiple licensing scenario here as several files with different licenses are packaged: - application: GPLv3+ - some images: GPLv2+ - some plugins: CC-BY-SA => base package: GPLv2+ and GPLv3+ => plugins-subpackage: GPLv3+ and CC-BY-SA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review