Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: galternatives - Alternatives Configurator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220860 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2006-12-29 02:18 EST ------- ... not a packaging issue, however... I get the following backtrace. ----------------------------------------------------- [root@softbank218114170036 ~]# LANG=C alternatives --display print print - status is auto. link currently points to /usr/bin/lpr.cups /usr/bin/lpr.cups - priority 40 slave print-cancel: /usr/bin/cancel.cups slave print-lp: /usr/bin/lp.cups slave print-lpq: /usr/bin/lpq.cups slave print-lprm: /usr/bin/lprm.cups slave print-lpstat: /usr/bin/lpstat.cups slave print-lpc: /usr/sbin/lpc.cups slave print-cancelman: /usr/share/man/man1/cancel-cups.1.gz slave print-lpman: /usr/share/man/man1/lp-cups.1.gz slave print-lpqman: /usr/share/man/man1/lpq-cups.1.gz slave print-lprman: /usr/share/man/man1/lpr-cups.1.gz slave print-lprmman: /usr/share/man/man1/lprm-cups.1.gz slave print-lpstatman: /usr/share/man/man1/lpstat-cups.1.gz slave print-lpcman: /usr/share/man/man8/lpc-cups.8.gz Current `best' version is /usr/bin/lpr.cups. [root@softbank218114170036 ~]# galternatives ========================================== (then select the item of print) ========================================== Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/galternatives/main.py", line 364, in alternative_selected_cb self.update_options_tree () File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/galternatives/main.py", line 400, in update_options_tree self.PRIORITY, int(option['priority']), ValueError: invalid literal for int() with base 10: '40 cups' ---------------------------------------------------- Would you know why? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review