Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=698952 Jan Safranek <jsafrane@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Jan Safranek <jsafrane@xxxxxxxxxx> 2011-04-26 04:21:24 EDT --- rpmlint output: aspell-pt_TP.src:27: W: configure-without-libdir-spec It has custom ./configure script, not autoconf. aspell-pt_PT.x86_64: E: no-binary aspell-pt_PT.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib Both are caused by aspell design, it's data files are architecture dependent and these reports seem to be common to all aspell language packages. All MUST/SHOULD package review items are ok, .spec file looks sane (apart from Epoch:50, which is another aspell oddity). %description should end with dot, not with comma, so please fix it before pushing to git. I don't want to stop review just because of this cosmetic stuff. So I approve the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review