Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: galternatives - Alternatives Configurator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220860 mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |galternatives - Alternatives|galternatives - Alternatives |Configurator |Configurator CC| |mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2006-12-28 21:38 EST ------- Please check the packages you created by rpmlint Very Very quick note: -------------------------------------- E: galternatives no-binary E: galternatives non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/galternatives/main.py 0644 E: galternatives non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/galternatives/gadebug.py 0644 E: galternatives non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/galternatives/common.py 0644 E: galternatives non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/galternatives/__init__.py 0644 E: galternatives non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/galternatives/alternative.py 0644 E: galternatives-debuginfo empty-debuginfo-package ---------------------------------------- * This seems to be a noarch rpm * Scripts with shebang should have executable permission (or, if 0644 permissons are correct, shebangs should be removed) * .pyo files are not marked as ghosts due to SELinux issues. * Please check Requires - This package should require pam explicitly - And "include" line of pam configuration file means that requirement of pam is version-specific (pam >= 0.80) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review