Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=651521 --- Comment #3 from Jaroslav Reznik <jreznik@xxxxxxxxxx> 2011-04-22 11:10:18 EDT --- Name: ok (upstream) Group: ok License: ok URL: ok Sources: ok, custom prepared, documented Summary/description: not sure "Qt WebKit bindings" makes sense here, maybe "Qt WebKit browser engine" sounds better Patches: ok BRs, reqs: ok Provides, obsoletes: please, provide qt-webkit SMP Flags: ok, present Ldconfig snippets: ok, present File attributes: ok Consistent macro usage: ok Devel package: ok, with correct Conflicts, Obsoletes. Is it enough to provide qt4-webkit-devel and not qt-webkit-devel? Package builds in Koji: ok, http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3019200 rpmlint output: rpmlint qtwebkit-2.1-2.fc16.src.rpm qtwebkit.src: W: invalid-url Source0: qtwebkit-developers-qtwebkit-qtwebkit-2.1.0.tar.xz 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. rpmlint qtwebkit-2.1-2.fc16.x86_64.rpm qtwebkit.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided qt-webkit > please fix qtwebkit.x86_64: W: no-documentation > ok 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review