Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=694287 --- Comment #25 from Richard Shaw <hobbes1069@xxxxxxxxx> 2011-04-21 14:14:27 EDT --- (In reply to comment #24) > No need for virtual provides, so also no need to worry about versions :) Yeah, I just thought about it. Since the libraries are not in Fedora separately, there's nothing to track. > You do a new spec + srpm fixing as much mentioned issues, then I do a full > review and then we go from there. I can post what I have now, but I think the only major issue left is all the undefined-non-weak-symbol warnings from rpmlint. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review