Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697247 --- Comment #1 from Eric Smith <eric@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2011-04-17 04:13:04 EDT --- Various parts of this package are covered by various licenses, all of which are already OK for Fedora except the "Whatever" license: Whatever License THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED 'AS-IS', WITHOUT ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTY. IN NO EVENT WILL THE AUTHORS BE HELD LIABLE FOR ANY DAMAGES ARISING FROM THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE. Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim or modified copies of this license document. Permission is granted to anyone to use this software for any purpose, including commercial applications, and to alter it and redistribute it freely. I have posted a request to the Fedora legal mailing list about it. --- Comment #2 from Eric Smith <eric@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2011-04-18 20:27:10 EDT --- Tom Callaway posted to the Fedora legal mailing list that the "Whatever" license is acceptable as an extremely permissive variant of the MIT license, and should be marked as such. I've updated the License tag in the spec accordingly: Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~brouhaha/gsmartcontrol/gsmartcontrol.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~brouhaha/gsmartcontrol/gsmartcontrol-0.8.5-2.fc14.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review