Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=689685 Rex Dieter <rdieter@xxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Rex Dieter <rdieter@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2011-04-18 15:25:37 EDT --- 1. As mentioned in comment #6, BR: gcc-c++ should be dropped. Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3009270 sources ok ba211b882225cec7a85923b0d626ef57 anchorman-0.0.1.tar.gz rpmlint *.rpm x86_64/*.rpm anchorman.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US webcam -> web cam, web-cam, webcast anchorman.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US icecast -> ice cast, ice-cast, icecap anchorman.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US webcam -> web cam, web-cam, webcast anchorman.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US icecast -> ice cast, ice-cast, icecap anchorman.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary anchorman 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings. mostly harmless here. licensing: ok naming: ok scriptlets: n/a runtime: naively running the binary (without option or webcam hardware present), gives me a segfault, but we can let that slide being a very new project. otherwise, nice-n-simple source and packaging all around. I won't block on item 1 above, but would appreciate it being fixed prior to doing any official builds. APPROVED (lifting NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review