[Bug 691818] Review Request: openpts - TCG Platform Trust Service (PTS) for embedded devices

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=691818

Avesh Agarwal <avagarwa@xxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|needinfo?(avagarwa@xxxxxxxx |needinfo?(mitr@xxxxxxxxxx)
                   |om)                         |

--- Comment #4 from Avesh Agarwal <avagarwa@xxxxxxxxxx> 2011-04-14 14:07:49 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Thanks for the update.
> 
> blocker:
> (In reply to comment #2)
> > (In reply to comment #1)
> > > * Source0: points to a HTML page.
> > >   If it is possible to use something similar to
> > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL#Sourceforge.net to get a
> > > direct URL to the tarball, this should be done.  This problem is not a blocker
> > > if no such option exists, obviously.
> > 
> > Can you please check again, because for me, it points to the file and lets me
> > download the package?
> 
> This is what I get:
> > $ wget 'http://sourceforge.jp/projects/openpts/downloads/51233/openpts-0.2.3.tgz'
> ...
> > --2011-04-14 18:35:32--  http://sourceforge.jp/projects/openpts/downloads/51233/openpts-0.2.3.tgz/
> > Length: unspecified [text/html]
> > Saving to: âindex.htmlâ
> ... and the file indeed contains HTML.
> 
> Are you seeing something different?  Is it possible that the behavior depends
> on the location of the client?
> 
> 

I am seeing same behaviour with wget. However, if you try to download by
clicking on the link that takes a bit of time before it asks you to save the
file. Not sure if this is the reason that wget can not download and outputs
this error "Length: unspecified [text/html]".

Anyway that is the only upstream link I have right now. Please let me know if
this is OK to go ahead.

> non-blocker:
> > > * Including the documenation from doc/ would probably be useful to users.
> > >   Please also consider including ChangeLog in %doc.
> > 
> > Fixed.
> I was thinking more of the manuals; the .eps files are included in the .tex
> files and probably not intended to be shipped stand-alone.  It seems that the
> manuals are not built by default.


You are right and since *.tex are not compiled to get pdf or eps, I did not
want to include them. If you want, I can remove *.eps. Although I though that
something is better than nothing ;-) . 

Again, please let me know as the above things are not blocker, then is it OK to
get ahead with the review?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]