Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676129 --- Comment #23 from Michal Schmidt <mschmidt@xxxxxxxxxx> 2011-04-09 09:00:30 EDT --- (In reply to comment #21) > I would use qconf-qt4 binary name by analogue with qmake-qt4. What you think? Yes, qconf-qt4 would be acceptable and the analogy with qmake-qt4 is nice. I had a look at Debian. They renamed the binary to qt-qconf: http://packages.debian.org/sid/amd64/qconf/filelist But they also use different naming of qmake than we do... I like qconf-qt4 better. (In reply to comment #22) > How you found this conflict? repoquery -f '*/qconf' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review