Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glade3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177747 ------- Additional Comments From paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2006-12-26 18:48 EST ------- Hmm, I can't see the logic (to be honest) of splitting the package in the way you have. To me, it makes far more sense to have glade3 with the binary and any shared libs (will the glade3 binary run without the libs?) and having a devel file with the .so files. Also, why have you moved from the standard version-release system to version-release.number? Please re-instate any changes that you made to the spec file prior to the version you want reviewing in the changelog - it helps people learn. 3.0.2 is quite an old version now - any chance of moving it to 3.1.4? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review