Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690282 --- Comment #10 from Alexander Kurtakov <akurtako@xxxxxxxxxx> 2011-04-01 07:47:26 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > The patches to Fedora JOGL originally came from Debian, we've modified them and > they've now gone back to Debian. This suggests that the Fedora JOGL package is > in a sufficiently good state to ship in the distro. > > Now, I may be missing some process step here. But I can't figure out how I'm > supposed to get this package from Review Request into the distro. I *have* > read the docs. Could someone with the knowledge and the power please just > bless the package? I'm happy to maintain it, I'm even happier to co-maintain > it with Sylvestre or any other experienced packager. > > So we've got (a) the technology, and (b) the labour. Is there any reason that > this can't go into F16? The reason I asked for the previous bug to be closed was that I was not sure who is supposed to be the maintainer? So Aidan are you going to be the maintainer or Jon? Aidan, Jon, Sylvestre - does some of you that is going to maintain the package needs to be sponsored to become Fedora packager? Can we get a matching spec file and srpm somewhere so I can do the review? Collecting patches is not the way review process is supposed to work, I'm not even sure whether the attached patch is the one I should be looking into. Whenever we get these things sorted I'll do the proper review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review