[Bug 691997] Review Request: nhn-nanum-fonts - Nanum family of Korean TrueType fonts

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=691997

Parag AN(àààà) <panemade@xxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
                 CC|                            |panemade@xxxxxxxxx
         AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    |panemade@xxxxxxxxx
               Flag|                            |fedora-review+

--- Comment #1 from Parag AN(àààà) <panemade@xxxxxxxxx> 2011-03-31 01:54:48 EDT ---
Review:
+ koji build -> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2962531
+ source verified as (sha1sum)
1cbfffdf8e5f81915642340560fb2ca7c1d08ef5  NanumFont_TTF_ALL.zip
1cbfffdf8e5f81915642340560fb2ca7c1d08ef5  ../SOURCES/NanumFont_TTF_ALL.zip
+ packaging looks fine.

Suggestion
1) If -common subpackage does not contain any files then it should be dropped.
2) Also, NanumPen.ttf and NanumBrush.ttf fonts contain 1.100 version while
other fonts have 3.010 version. We can also create versioned subpackages for
those 2 fonts.
3) If this is going to be packaged for Fedora 13 onwards then drop %clean
section and cleanup of buildroot in %install.

APPROVED.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]