Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=627032 --- Comment #8 from Ville Skyttà <ville.skytta@xxxxxx> 2011-03-29 15:03:54 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > You can make sub-packages in your package, eg. w3c-linkchecker-apache that will > supply the configuration files for apache, and do so for every sever you like > (one is enough, if you don't want too many subpackages), and the main package > would only provide the command line application. Yes, that describes the b) option I mentioned, and my opinion about it is unchanged. > C is not an option, it is against the guidelines. No it's not, it's standard packaging practice in certain situations. See "multiple ownership" and "The directory is owned by a package which is not required for your package to function" at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#File_and_Directory_Ownership -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review