Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=691635 --- Comment #7 from elad <el.il@xxxxxxxxxx> 2011-03-29 06:00:35 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #5) > > (In reply to comment #4) > > > Thank you for the review. > > > > > > > > > > 3. Missing build dependency: pygtk2 > > > > > > Weird, it built in mock correctly. > > Upstream list it as a dependency. > > > > > > > 4. Missing run-time dependencies: mobile-broadband-provider-info, ModemManager > > > > > > Do I need to specify explicit requires? > > I think so. > > > > > These are *not* build deps, they are runtime deps which rpm will figure out on > its own. They do not need to be specified IMO. > > Ankur [elad@E-Desktop noarch]$ rpm -qp --requires ppm-20110323-1.fc15.noarch.rpm/bin/sh /usr/bin/python rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PartialHardlinkSets) <= 4.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1 Doesn't seems that rpm figures it out automatically. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review