[Bug 691541] Review Request: icedtea-web - Additional Java components for OpenJDK

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=691541

--- Comment #2 from Deepak Bhole <dbhole@xxxxxxxxxx> 2011-03-28 18:01:06 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Packaging Guidelines:
> 
> - Naming: OK.
> - Version and Release: OK
> - MD5 sum of source tar matches with upstream: OK
> - Spec Legibility: OK
> - Architecture Support: Issues
> Any reason for ExclusiveArch?
> - File System Layout: OK
> Ideally icedtea-web should install into a normal prefix, not into a JDK dir.But
> since this is how upstream is handling it _and_ how this was handled when it
> was a part of java-1.6.0-openjdk-plugin, this is OK for now.
> - rpmlint: OK
> icedtea-web.spec:97: W: configure-without-libdir-spec
> This is the same problem as above. OK for now.
> icedtea-web.spec:42: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 11, tab:
> line 42)
> Please fix this?

Fixed.

> - Requires: OK
> - BuildRequires: OK
> - Summary and Description: OK
> - Documentation: Issues
> Please use %{_javadocdir} for javadoc directory path. The javadoc package needs

Fixed.

> to be declared as noarch.
> - Compiler Flags: Issues
> Compiler flags (RPM_OPT_FLAGS, etc) are not being passed.

Fixed.

> - DebugInfo Packages: OK
> - Devel Packages: N/A
> - Requiring Base Package: Issues
> The Javadocs dont depend on the main package for functionality; please remove
> the requires on main package.

Done.

> - Static and Shared Libraries: OK
> - Desktop files: OK
> - Macros: Issues
> %define used instead of %global. Please use %global
> - Scriptlets: OK
> I dont understand why only the first alternatives command in %post is if'd.
> Shouldnt the second alternatives invocation be if'd as well?

Actually, the if in %post shouldn't be an if at all. I had copied and pasted it
from the original rpm. We want it to run each time. The if has been removed
now.

The one in %postun needs to stay in an if as we want it to run only during
uninstall and not during upgrade.

> - File and directory ownership: OK
> - Others:
> Please remove all invocations of rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. It is unneeded on
> recent version of Fedora.

Done.

New spec file and srpm uploaded.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]