Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=636819 --- Comment #20 from Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> 2011-03-28 03:50:55 EDT --- (In reply to comment #19) > I did another unofficial package review: Bug #627032 > > But I think I'll have to drop my two other packages that are pending review > because of dead upstream... Hi, Great to see that you're still working actively to become a Fefora packager. And I'm so sorry for not responding sooner. I've changed teams at my work and I've been crazy busy with tasks for the new team ever since. I've put looking at your package submissions high on my to do list and I hope to get around to them sometime this week. WRT dead upstreams, that is unfortunate. However if the software in question is reasonably complete and stable, and you're actively using it (ie have a purpose for it), then it is fine to package software with a dead upstream. We've plenty of examples of that. It is not an ideal solution though. So you'll need to decide if you want to move forward with those 2 submissions as well, or if you want to drop them. If you want to drop them, you can simply close the bugs, with a short explanation why you're dropping them. Thanks & Regards, Hans -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review