[Bug 207685] Review Request: gstreamer-plugins-farsight - GStreamer plug-ins for farsight protocol

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: gstreamer-plugins-farsight - GStreamer plug-ins for farsight protocol


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207685


jspaleta@xxxxxxxxx changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|63778                       |163779
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From jspaleta@xxxxxxxxx  2006-12-22 21:19 EST -------

GOOD:
*Built in mock on i386 against fedora-development
*rpmlint runs cleanly against it
*follows naming guidelines for addon packages
*licnese is GPL and spec tag matches
*COPYING file in %doc
*spec in US/english and legible
*Include source matches upstream md5sum
77c92554c2bd57ad1b426e5ba50eb9a8  gst-plugins-farsight-0.10.2.tar.gz
*buildrequires look good
*no locales to worry about
*only gstreamer plugin so's no shared libs in default linker path
*not relocatable
*does not create any unowned directories. Package requires   
  gstreamer-plugins-base which in turns requires gstreamer which owns 
  /usr/lib/gstreamer-0.10
*no duplicates in %files
*file permissions seem fine
*install and clean sections look good
*macro use is consistent
*docs is good
*no -devel subpackage
*la files removed in install section
*not a gui, no desktop file needed
*appears to meet all packaging guidelines


One small thing I'd like to see changed. Can you rename the macro at from
majorminor to gst_majorminor?  I was slightly confused initially because its the
same numerical value as the package version majorminor. Its clear now its a
macro to define the gstreamer majorminor, but it would be helpful for clarity to
change the name to gst_majorminor.  This is not a blocker however, but it may
help save a little time if someone has to pick this package up from you later.

This package is APPROVED for entry into the development tree.


I haven't tested this yet, I'm be building stream-engine next so I can test this. 


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]