Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573917 Ralf Corsepius <rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx --- Comment #6 from Ralf Corsepius <rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx> 2011-03-22 02:20:07 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > Thanks for the quick work! > > Actually, there's one last step we should take, and that's to include a copy of > the GPL with the package. (Second dot point in comment #2) Doing so is not mandatory in Fedora. Legally, it's questionable, because a Fedora packager added license file isn't legally binding to upstream (only upstream can do this). > From the email, it sounds like it's unlikely that upstream will generate a new > tarball for us, so instead could you please contact them again and: > > * attach a copy of the GPLv1 (not any other version) to the email Are you sure? This GPLv1 is dead for more than a decade. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review