Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573917 Ruediger Landmann <r.landmann@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |r.landmann@xxxxxxxxxx Flag| |needinfo?(jan.klepek@gmail. | |com) Bug 573917 depends on bug 573848, which changed state. Bug 573848 Summary: Review Request: perl-NetPacket - Modules to assemble/disassemble network packets at the protocol level https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573848 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA Bug 573917 depends on bug 573918, which changed state. Bug 573918 Summary: Review Request: perl-NetPacket-LLC - Assemble and disassemble IEEE 802.3 LLC protocol packets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573918 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA Resolution| |ERRATA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED --- Comment #2 from Ruediger Landmann <r.landmann@xxxxxxxxxx> 2011-03-21 01:16:36 EDT --- Jan, this looks pretty good: rpmlint is quiet and the package builds cleanly. However, you say in the specfile that the license is "Artistic clarified" -- but the README, SpanningTree.pm, and the upstream at cpan all simply state "Artistic" and link to Artistic 1.0, which we can't use.[0] Is there somewhere else in the source that states that the license is "Artistic clarified"? If not, you need to contact upstream and ask them if they would consider relicensing the package, perhaps as "Artistic or GPL" (ie, the same as Perl itself). If they're happy to do so, please ask them to make a version of the source available with a copy of the GPL included in it. You will then need to rebuild the package to include: * a copy of their email (with full headers) in which they agree to relicense the package * their new source that includes a copy of the GPL Cheers, Rudi [0] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main#Bad_Licenses -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review