Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676129 --- Comment #5 from Michal Schmidt <mschmidt@xxxxxxxxxx> 2011-03-18 15:25:54 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > I must use ./configure instead macro. qconf don't use autotools configure. So > number of macro arguments don't acceptable this ./configure. I trying used > macro but get error. I see. This is a sufficient reason. Next I was going to suggest that you need to ensure %{optflags} are used in the build ( http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines#Compiler_flags ), but apparently this somehow works already. I made a scratch build and I can see the familiar compiler flags in the g++ invocations ("-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fstack-protector ..."). http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2923980 I do not understand where the ./configure script gets the flags from, so it may or may not be the correct way. > Also I wonder that it will prefer if i use .gz source tarball instead .bz2 . You can choose whichever you like more. bz2 practically always achieves better compression than gz, so most packagers select bz2 when choosing between the two. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review