Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688157 --- Comment #2 from Petr Sabata <psabata@xxxxxxxxxx> 2011-03-17 05:43:22 EDT --- Marcela, thank you for the review. (In reply to comment #1) > (...) > - package MUST successfully compile and build > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2919367 > - architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla OK > - build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires ? Fixed by re-including the old 'disable-gsic' patch. > (...) > - devel package usually require base package ? Fixed. > (...) > In archive is directory cpupowerutils-cpupowerutils. Is it intentional? This was a gitorious.org export. I repackaged the sources tarball to look sane, dropping the %setup -n option. > Patch0 should be sent to upstream or have at least bug in our bugzilla. This was reported by EL6 QA -- language files should have the same creation times on all architectures. Since Koji might build packages at different times, it's not always the case. This patch forces a certain exact time for them. Fixed spec and 0.2.p1 SRPM: http://psabata.fedorapeople.org/packages/cpupowerutils/cpupowerutils.spec http://psabata.fedorapeople.org/packages/cpupowerutils/cpupowerutils-009-0.2.p1.fc14.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review