Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libextractor -- Simple library for keyword extraction https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214087 ------- Additional Comments From enrico.scholz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2006-12-21 10:51 EST ------- > * For main package: > ---------------------------------- > Requires: plugin(%name) > ---------------------------------- > What I meant was main package (libextract) should require at least > base plugin package (libextract-plugins-base). plugin(%name) is > not provided by libextract-plugins-base and then currently extra > plugin package is needed for main (libextract) package. I do not think so: 1. libextract works without plugins too. But because output is very limited in this case, you can say that plugins are highly recommended (*not* required) Nevertheless, because 'highly recommended' can not be expressed with RPM, I accept that some 'Requires:' should be used. 2. libextract does not require the -plugins-base plugins but works e.g. with the thumbnail plugin when e.g. a collection of images shall be indexed Therefore, I use | Requires: plugin(%name) which satisfies 1. and allows users to install only the really needed plugins (2.). > * For fake plugin package (libextract-plugins) > Dependency for pdf plugin (libextract-plugins-pdf) is missing. ok; I will add this dependency (but do not ship a new package for this change). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review