Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=681558 Tomas Mraz <tmraz@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Tomas Mraz <tmraz@xxxxxxxxxx> 2011-03-15 17:17:51 EDT --- The rpmlint output: rpmlint -v libvirt-snmp-0.0.1-3.fc13.src.rpm libvirt-snmp-0.0.1-3.fc13.x86_64.rpm libvirt-snmp-debuginfo-0.0.1-3.fc13.x86_64.rpm libvirt-snmp.src: I: checking libvirt-snmp.src: I: checking-url http://libvirt.org (timeout 10 seconds) libvirt-snmp.src:40: W: macro-in-%changelog %doc This is harmless, but please correct it before you import. Just remove the % so it is not interpreted. libvirt-snmp.src: I: checking-url http://www.libvirt.org/sources/snmp/libvirt-snmp-0.0.1.tar.gz (timeout 10 seconds) libvirt-snmp.x86_64: I: checking libvirt-snmp.x86_64: I: checking-url http://libvirt.org (timeout 10 seconds) libvirt-snmp-debuginfo.x86_64: I: checking libvirt-snmp-debuginfo.x86_64: I: checking-url http://libvirt.org (timeout 10 seconds) 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. Other than the non-blocker issue the rpmlint is silent. The package seems to comply with Fedora packaging guidelines. APPROVED. I will sponsor you for fedora packager group. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review