Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=680657 --- Comment #4 from Ankur Sinha <sanjay.ankur@xxxxxxxxx> 2011-03-13 16:15:59 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > @Jason, > > Ok, currently the license of this md5.cpp file is not mentioned in the spec > file. That has to be done. However I am unable to find out what license that > file is under. The text seems to match MIT license but not word for word. > > @sanjay.ankur@xxxxxxxxx , can you have a look at that file as well? It is > md5.cpp It looks like a variant of the BSD license. This one in particular is pretty close to the license statement of md5.cpp : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/BSD#Hybrid_BSD_.28half_BSD.2C_half_zlib.29 Jason, how do you suggest I proceed? Thanks, Ankur -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review