Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: qt-qsa - QT Script for Applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219539 ------- Additional Comments From mr.ecik@xxxxxxxxx 2006-12-20 16:11 EST ------- MUST items: * rpmlint output: E: qt-qsa-devel only-non-binary-in-usr-lib W: qt-qsa-devel hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/doc/qt-qsa-devel-1.1.4/examples/ spreadsheet/.examplefiles W: qt-qsa-devel hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/doc/qt-qsa-devel-1.1.4/examples/ spreadsheet/.examplefiles E: qt-qsa configure-without-libdir-spec it looks like we can ignore all the issues * package is named well * spec file name is good * package meets Packaging Guidelines * package is licensed with a GPL open-source compatible license * License field in spec file matches actual license * license file is included in %doc * md5sums are matching (24eb504e51de3a04161f6df8c39c24ac) * package successfully compiles on x86_64 * BuildRequires listed well * no locales * %post and %postun sections present * relocatable * package owns directories well * no duplicates in %files * every %files section includes %defattr * proper %clean section * macros used well !* -devel subpackage presents, but needs to have an additional dependency THINGS to do: * qt-qsa-devel stores its files in %{_libdir}/qt-3.3/{include,mkspecs/ features} which are owned by qt-devel so you need to append a qt-devel dependency to devel subpackage Fix that and package will be approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review