Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=615508 Sergio Belkin <sebelk@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sebelk@xxxxxxxxx --- Comment #8 from Sergio Belkin <sebelk@xxxxxxxxx> 2011-03-12 23:05:25 EST --- Hi Ankur, . Have you seen the output of rpmlint?: rpmlint -i -v /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-i386/root/builddir/build/RPMS/nut-nutrition-15.7-3.fc16.i686.rpm nut-nutrition.i686: I: checking nut-nutrition.i686: I: checking-url http://nut.sourceforge.net/ (timeout 10 seconds) nut-nutrition.i686: E: zero-length /usr/share/nut/WEIGHT.txt nut-nutrition.i686: E: zero-length /usr/share/nut/FOOD_DES.txt nut-nutrition.i686: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/man/man1/nut.1.gz The file is installed with executable permissions, but was identified as one that probably should not be executable. Verify if the executable bits are desired, and remove if not. - does the empty files make sense? - Remove the unnecesary file mode bits of man page. - I think that the best should be change wholly the package name instead to use the "binary" name... otherwise as already manuel told could be misleading existing nut since a lont time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review