Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683127 --- Comment #3 from John D. Ramsdell <ramsdell@xxxxxxxxx> 2011-03-08 13:14:58 EST --- (In reply to comment #1) Thanks for you quick reply. I fixed the errors in my local copy of the spec file, although I still don't see where the instructions say the Packager and Vendor tags should be omitted. I ran rpmlint, and it didn't complain about the tags, or maybe it did, and I didn't understand the warning I received. I don't understand what is wrong with my review summary. I thought I was supposed to supply the name of the package followed by a hyphen and then the summary from the spec file. Please tell me what I should have written. > Please fix your review summary: > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#Create_Your_Review_Request > > Also take a look at Packaging Guidelines: > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines > > * The Packager tag should not be used in spec files. > * The Vendor tag should not be used. > > Do you plan to release an EPEL5 package? Read about BuildRoot tag. > > Remove trousers explicit Require. > > Why package INSTALL file? > > Check "Parallel make" section under Guidelines too. > > You should understand most of this process before ask for sponsoring... > so, let's read the docs :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review