[Bug 188478] Review Request: fxload-2002_04_11.spec

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: fxload-2002_04_11.spec


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188478


kwizart@xxxxxxxxx changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |kwizart@xxxxxxxxx




------- Additional Comments From kwizart@xxxxxxxxx  2006-12-18 12:06 EST -------
In my view there is no problem with the license since the License owner is
included. That what this text try to say no?
Thought it conform (!? need to confim ?) to the extras rules which can now
provides binaries (and sources) firmware which are needed to support hardware.
(exemple has been discussed with ipw2200-firmware ).

Thought the Spec file provides 404...
You can see #218887 but version is the same...


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]