Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676853 --- Comment #3 from Remi Collet <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2011-02-23 03:26:15 EST --- I really think than docs should be in a subpackage (as for others *mm package) : - include = 0.5Mio, doc = 5Mio - should requires others documentation (for links) which are already split I agree than libsig++20-doc must (co-)own %{_datadir}/devhelp/ (which is not owned by any required package). But others package, which requires libsig++20-doc must not own this "already" owned dir. -doc subpackage should also comes with the COPYING file (as it doesn't requires the main package) http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#Subpackage_Licensing *devhelp must also be tagged as %doc if pointed files are tagged as %doc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review