Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-twisted-runner - process management library and inetd replacement https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216104 kevin@xxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |kevin@xxxxxxxxx ------- Additional Comments From kevin@xxxxxxxxx 2006-12-16 14:09 EST ------- OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License (MIT) OK - License field in spec matches See below - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: ec4677a59dd2643d50da0914b3a1df88 TwistedRunner-0.2.0.tar.bz2 ec4677a59dd2643d50da0914b3a1df88 TwistedRunner-0.2.0.tar.bz2.1 OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - No rpmlint output. See below - final provides and requires are sane: SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. x386/x86_64 - Should build on all supported archs OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version Issues: 1. Ditto the %{python} macro comment from the other python-twisted reviews. ;) 2. Should include LICENSE and NEWS as %doc files. 3. I see that this package is providing: portmap.so (on i386) and portmap.so()(64bit) (on x86_64) Should that be the case? Or should that be filtered out? Thats a pretty generic .so name and it's not in a standard dir where something could link to it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review