Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513320 --- Comment #24 from Stewart Adam <s.adam@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2011-02-19 17:30:00 EST --- SPEC: http://firewing.fedorapeople.org/pub/SPECS/boxbackup.spec SRPM: http://firewing.fedorapeople.org/pub/SRPMS/boxbackup-0.11-0.4.rc8.fc14.src.rpm I have changed the License tag to "Box Backup GPL", which is the name upstream gave for the GPLv2-like license with the linking exceptions for OpenSSL and MS VSS. This makes rpmlint output a new warning: boxbackup.src: W: invalid-license Box Backup GPL Although I believe we can ignore this as spot gave the OK. Perhaps we ask him to look it over quickly again just to be sure? As for the ownership of /etc/boxbackup, the troublesome part is that both the client and the server packages store their files in sub-directories of /etc/boxbackup so I've made both packages own it. rpmlint also complains about this: boxbackup.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /etc/boxbackup boxbackup boxbackup.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /etc/boxbackup 0700L I've done used nonstandard permissions (boxbackup:root 0700) to prevent outside users from taking peeks at the backup configuration (for either the client or server) or from gaining access to the certificates/encryption keys. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review