[Bug 677693] Review Request: tintin - TinTin++, aka tt++, is a free MUD client.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=677693

--- Comment #12 from Petr Sabata <psabata@xxxxxxxxxx> 2011-02-16 11:16:58 EST ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> (In reply to comment #10)
> > upstream ships the docs directory with 0711 permissions; I have to change this
> > if I want to include the directory without moving the files out of it, don't I?
> 
> nope.
> 
> %files
> %defattr(-,root,root,755)
> %doc %attr(0644,root,root) COPYING CREDITS FAQ INSTALL README
> %doc %attr(0755,root,root) mods
> %{_bindir}/tt++
> 
> %files doc
> %defattr(-,root,root,755)
> %doc %attr(0644,root,root) COPYING
> %doc %attr(0644,root,root) SCRIPTS
> %doc %attr(0644,root,root) docs/*
> 

If I use this, I get some weird results

# ls -ld /usr/share/doc/tintin-*
drw-r--r-- 3 root root 4096 Feb 16 17:11 /usr/share/doc/tintin-2.00.5
drw-r--r-- 2 root root 4096 Feb 16 17:11 /usr/share/doc/tintin-doc-2.00.5
# ls -l /usr/share/doc/tintin-2.00.5/
total 48
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 18009 Jul  5  2009 COPYING
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root  1916 Dec 28 18:10 CREDITS
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root  4840 Dec 28 18:37 FAQ
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root  1209 Aug  2  2009 INSTALL
drw-r--r-- 2 root root  4096 Feb 16 17:11 mods
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root  6736 Dec 28 18:40 README

Could you tell why executable bits aren't set?
I guess it could be caused by some mask in the case of the mods directory but
the parent directories in docdir scare me.
(current, stable F-14)

> > 
> > Ad doc files on one line: this is just a cosmetic change; I like to separate
> > certain files from others if they are e.g. a "different documentation
> > category".
> 
> yep ;)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]