[Bug 677181] Please update to latexila 2.0.5

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=677181

--- Comment #5 from SÃbastien Wilmet <sebastien.wilmet@xxxxxxxxx> 2011-02-15 13:31:16 EST ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> After asking on #fedora-devel, it seems that it may not be acceptable to keep
> it like that. Is it a big deal to have it work with Vala >= 0.11 ?

No, normally it should be easy. But if I switch to Vala 0.11 and remove the C
code, how to package it for F14?

The C code generated was for me the best solution because I don't need to
maintain several branches for each version of Vala. AFAIK other Vala projects
do the same.

IMHO Fedora should have several Vala packages, one for each version. Since it
seems that there is no plan for doing this, I've chosen the best compromise.
The C code is rightly there to simplify installing and packaging.

Why it is not acceptable to keep it like that?

Anyway, for the package, if the C code have to be absolutely regenerated, then
it is quiet easy:
- rm src/C/*.c
- run cmake with -DBUILD_VALA=ON

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]