[Bug 672455] Review Request: perl-AnyEvent-DBus - Adapt Net::DBus to AnyEvent

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672455

--- Comment #13 from Mathieu Bridon <bochecha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2011-02-10 12:49:26 EST ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> Ralf's discourse may be bereft of tact, but the point remains that he's
> concerned about statements such as "I only am interested in el6."  As am I,
> honestly.

Perhaps I didn't chose my words carefully enough though, please put that on
account of me not being a native english speaker and allow me to rephrase:

I only depend on this package being in EPEL6, so I have a particular interest
for this branch.

In other words, that is a positive statement about the EPEL6 branch, it is not
a negative statement about the Fedora ones.

I will take care of this packages in all the branches it has been pushed to,
but as a maintainer, I have always thought I had the right to decide in which
branch I would push my package.

> EPEL is supposed to be an easy way to get Fedora packages on RHEL,
> but statements such at that make it seem that Fedora is merely an annoyance
> required to get things into EPEL.

That's not the case.

In the past I have only ever contributed to Fedora, since I have never needed
anything in EPEL. But if someone had asked me to push one of my packages to
EPEL (and if I had the required amount of time to take care of it afterwards),
then I would have.

This time, it is the other way around: I only need this package in EPEL6, but I
will take care of it in Fedora as well.

Actually, if Ralf's (or anyone else's for that matter) initial comment had been
 I'd like to see this package in Fedora 14 as well, and will help you maintain
it in this branch Â, then I would have asked for it and set him as
co-maintainer. I would even have made the initial builds and update requests,
since I was doing all that for Rawhide and EPEL6 anyway, and we'd have
coordinated the next builds/updates, as is certainly the case for any package
maintained by more than one person.

But you'll agree that it would have been a very different request from  I
don't consider it reasonable Â, which (at least to me) sounds more like  you
will do all the work because I say so Â.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]