Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673839 --- Comment #8 from Matej Cepl <mcepl@xxxxxxxxxx> 2011-02-10 11:43:56 EST --- (In reply to comment #7) > Sure? Aside...RHEL 5 should get a more recent boost version anyway :) No, it won't (chat with boost maintainer) [17:36:00] mcepl: Hi, I have a question about boost in RHEL-5. Is there any chance it would get rebased (or in words, could you comment please on https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673839#c7)? [17:36:16] bkoz: no need to look. It's not getting rebased [17:36:54] mcepl: I am a bit involved in packaging Zarafa for RHEL-5, and it requires higher version of boost than what we have in RHEL-5. So, paralell package ... boost141 in EPEL, is I guess the only way, right? [17:39:22] mcepl: also, can I post this chat to the bug? ï [17:40:24] bkoz: can you bundle the boost version needed in the zarafa itself? look at the way monotone used to do this [17:41:35] mcepl: well, it is not loved by the EPEL team and Packaging Guidelines I am afraid. [17:43:00] bkoz: sure, you can post. There's no good solution here [17:43:03] mcepl: we tried to suggest this option to EPEL folks and they were unequivocally against [17:43:07] mcepl: OK, thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review