Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673919 --- Comment #2 from Guillermo GÃmez <guillermo.gomez@xxxxxxxxx> 2011-02-09 13:29:52 EST --- MUST ---- rpmlint output - MISSING Package name - OK Spec file matches base package - OK License must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines - OK License in spec must match actual license - OK License file include in %doc - OK Spec file written in American English - OK Spec file legible - OK Tar ball matches upstream - OK Package successfully builds binary RPMs - OK (koji f13,f14, local f14 x86_64) No duplicate files - OK Macro use must be consistant - OK At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} - OK All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8 - OK Your package should contain man pages for binaries/scripts. If it doesn't, work with upstream to add them where they make sense - SHOULD /etc/rc.d/init.d/banana sysv initscript provided but not configured. Please follow http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SysVInitScript to include the initscript. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review