Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675495 --- Comment #3 from Ville Skyttà <ville.skytta@xxxxxx> 2011-02-06 07:34:49 EST --- The only sane two options I can think of right now are either to wait upstreams to resolve the issue, or to ship GNU parallel with the executable, man page and references to the executable in the man page renamed to something. If renaming, I suggest gparallel because that's already done in the wild to some extent (see below), and many GNU utilities have the g prefix anyway to distinguish them from other similar tools with the same name. I did some research what other distributions do: Gentoo takes the gparallel approach: http://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/sys-process/parallel/parallel-20110122.ebuild?revision=1.1&view=markup FreeBSD splits parallel from moreutils into moreutils-parallel: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/sysutils/parallel/Makefile?rev=1.8 http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/sysutils/moreutils-parallel/Makefile?rev=1.1 http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=152973 Debian, Ubuntu, Mandriva and openSUSE don't seem to have GNU parallel packages available. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review