Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675050 --- Comment #4 from Ralf Corsepius <rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx> 2011-02-04 09:34:06 EST --- (In reply to comment #3) > Are you sure about that "obvious bug" Ralf? Hmm, /usr/include/glusterfs/iatt.h contains #include "uuid.h" This means this file want to include /usr/include/uuid.h > The intended reference is actually > to /usr/include/glusterfs/uuid.h which is owned by glusterfs-devel, not > /usr/include/uuid.h which is owned by uuid-devel. Then the glusterfs headers' design is questionable, because they depend upon -I/usr/include/glusterfs and fail otherwise (cf. above). This also is a questionable and error-prone design, because passing -I/usr/include/glusterfs then will shadow /usr/include/uuid.h, i.e. render including both headers from inside of the same build directory will become difficult. I'd recommend glusterfs to change their headers to using <glusterfs/...h>. > This file was not installed > prior to glusterfs-devel-3.1.2-2, which is why I mentioned it above, but with > that version it does build. In this case, your build requires are not strict enough. BR: glusterfs >= <minimum version> > Is it possible that 3.1.2-2 just hasn't hit the > repo yet? Probably - I was building your package in mock with what was current then (And yes, Fedora's repos being out of sync and/or being broken is an often occuring and long-term persisting issue to me). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review