Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-File - Common file and directory routines Alias: php-pear-File https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219575 ------- Additional Comments From fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2006-12-14 00:41 EST ------- package meets naming and packaging guidelines. specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. dist tag is present. build root is correct. license field matches the actual license. license is open source-compatible. License text included in package. source files match upstream: ba8f020b70fb6a37c6258e0e42033aad File-1.2.2.tgz latest version is being packaged. BuildRequires are proper. rpmlint is silent. final provides and requires are sane no shared libraries are present. package is not relocatable. owns the directories it creates. doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. no duplicates in %files. file permissions are appropriate. %clean is present. no %check is present no scriptlets present. code, not content. documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. no headers. no pkgconfig files. no libtool .la droppings. not a GUI app. not a web app. Very standard PEAR package, everything check out - APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review