[Bug 672246] Review Request: perl-Statistics-Basic - A collection of very basic statistics modules

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672246

Paul Howarth <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx

--- Comment #7 from Paul Howarth <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2011-02-02 07:13:12 EST ---
Just reading through some mailing lists I'd fallen behind with when I came
across this:

(In reply to comment #1)
> rpm -qp --provides perl-Statistics-Basic-1.6602-1.fc14.noarch.rpm 
> perl(Statistics::Basic) = 1.6602
> perl(Statistics::Basic::ComputedVector)  
> perl(Statistics::Basic::Correlation)  
> perl(Statistics::Basic::Covariance)  
> perl(Statistics::Basic::LeastSquareFit)  
> perl(Statistics::Basic::Mean)  
> perl(Statistics::Basic::Median)  
> perl(Statistics::Basic::Mode)  
> perl(Statistics::Basic::_OneVectorBase)  
> perl(Statistics::Basic::StdDev)  
> perl(Statistics::Basic::_TwoVectorBase)  
> perl(Statistics::Basic::Variance)  
> perl(Statistics::Basic::Vector)  
> perl-Statistics-Basic = 1.6602-1.fc14
> 
> rpm -qp --requires perl-Statistics-Basic-1.6602-1.fc14.noarch.rpm 
> perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.2)  
> perl(Number::Format) >= 1.42
> rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
> rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
> rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <= 3.0.3-1
> perl(base)  
> perl(Carp)  
> perl(Scalar::Util)  
> perl(Statistics::Basic)  
> perl(strict)  
> perl(warnings)  
> rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <= 3.0.3-1
> 
> Comments:
> * I dislike your description, but that's nothing better on upstream page.
> * Shouldn't be also perl(Statistics::Basic) provided without version? This
> could be blocker for other packages requiring any other release.

On the contrary, unversioned provides should be avoided if at all possible
because rpm treats them as "any version".

So for instance, if a package containing perl(foo) version 1.01 contained an
unversioned provide of perl(foo), package "bar" that required "perl(foo) > 2"
would be satisfied by that version 1.01 package even if it also contained a
provide for "perl(foo) = 1.01" due to the unversioned provide satisfying the
dependency.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]