[Bug 668820] Review Request: rubygem-rdoc - RDoc produces HTML and command-line documentation for Ruby projects

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668820

--- Comment #3 from VÃt Ondruch <vondruch@xxxxxxxxxx> 2011-02-01 04:37:57 EST ---
Btw. I did not mentioned it here before, but according to Ruby Packaging
Guidelines: 

"If the same Ruby library is to be packaged for use as a Gem and as a straight
Ruby library without Gem support, it must be packaged as a Gem first. To make
it available to code that does not use Ruby Gems, a subpackage called
ruby-%{gemname} must be created in the rubygem-%{gemname} package such that"

We already have ruby-rdoc package, so this package does not follow the
guidelines precisely. I know they should not conflict, they are designed to
work side by side, I just believe I should note it here.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]