Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670040 --- Comment #3 from Jon Stanley <jonstanley@xxxxxxxxx> 2011-02-01 01:55:48 EST --- * Sources match upstream * License OK and matches source files * %doc files do not affect runtime * License text not included with upstream or in %doc (OK, might want to ask upstream about this) * Package is code I think that the Python script should be moved into a separate subpackage so that the script can be dependency complete - no sense in having bits on the disk that are going to traceback the minute you try and use it. There's also no sense in having python-imaging pulled in by a MW extension that doesn't require the python piece in order to work. I think that the solution to this is to move the python script into a subpackage and have that subpackage require python-imaging. I'll reach out to some other folks to see what the "official" stance on this issue is. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review