Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: horde - php application framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189195 ------- Additional Comments From fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2006-12-13 14:58 EST ------- I'm extremely still interested in getting this package in... I've just not had anyone committed to a full review. I'll try to get some new RPMs out the door tonight that include php-domxml instead of php-xml per Greg's comments. WRT php-database, I'm torn. Granted, it's not required for horde to be operational, but most users will want to use horde's DB storage for preferences, etc. What is FE's usual "best-practice" for optional dependencies: minimalistic dependency chains for advanced users, or added dependencies for more default functionality? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review