[Bug 189195] Review Request: horde - php application framework

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: horde - php application framework


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189195





------- Additional Comments From fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx  2006-12-13 14:58 EST -------
I'm extremely still interested in getting this package in... I've just not had
anyone committed to a full review.  I'll try to get some new RPMs out the door
tonight that include php-domxml instead of php-xml per Greg's comments.

WRT php-database, I'm torn.  Granted, it's not required for horde to be
operational, but most users will want to use horde's DB storage for preferences,
etc.  What is FE's usual "best-practice" for optional dependencies: minimalistic
dependency chains for advanced users, or added dependencies for more default
functionality?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]