Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652987 --- Comment #25 from d. johnson <drjohnson1@xxxxxxxxx> 2011-01-27 20:33:01 EST --- Thank you Renich. This version does indeed build in koji. rpmlint has a few complaints about it however. go.x86_64: E: statically-linked-binary /usr/bin/goinstall go.x86_64: E: statically-linked-binary /usr/bin/ebnflint go.x86_64: E: statically-linked-binary /usr/bin/gofmt go.x86_64: E: statically-linked-binary /usr/bin/godoc go.x86_64: E: statically-linked-binary /usr/bin/govet go.x86_64: E: statically-linked-binary /usr/bin/goyacc go.x86_64: E: statically-linked-binary /usr/bin/cgo go.x86_64: E: statically-linked-binary /usr/bin/hgpatch 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 8 errors, 325 warnings. The above errors should really be fixed, http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Staticly_Linking_Executables A bunch of static libraries were built, and should be in a -static package rather than the main one if included at all. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Packaging_Static_Libraries Many of the binaries are without manual pages or documentation. (Upstream?) Trivial .spec fix? go.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/go-20110120/progs/run go.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/go-20110120/prog.sh go.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/go-20110120/makehtml go.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/bash_completion.d/go go.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/go-20110120/codelab/wiki/test.sh These subpackages should likely include a LICENSE file if nothing else: go-emacs.x86_64: W: no-documentation go-vim.x86_64: W: no-documentation -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review