[Bug 576591] Review Request: iptraf-ng

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576591

--- Comment #14 from Terje RÃÂsten <terjeros@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2011-01-26 08:01:52 EST ---
No, don't help.

This line

Provides:       iptraf-ng = %{version}

is implicit any way. 

This line

Obsoletes:      iptraf <= 3.0.1-10

is correct.

This means when iptraf-ng is installed iptraf is removed, I guess you want that
to happen

Now if some installed package A have a dep on iptraf,
rpm/yum will refuse to install iptraf-ng as iptraf is removed with nothing to
satisfy the dep package A has on iptraf. So we solve that by adding

Provides:       iptraf = %{version}-%{release}

in iptraf-ng.spec, letting iptraf-ng satisfy the dep pacakge A has on iptraf.

However, we have just obsoleted iptraf <= 3.0.1-10, when
%{version}-%{release} < 3.0.1-10 the package obsoletes itself, not good.

I see two options:

- adjust %{version} to be > 3.0.1

or use this line

Provides:       iptraf = 3.0.1-11

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]