Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672246 Marcela MaÅlÃÅovà <mmaslano@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |mmaslano@xxxxxxxxxx --- Comment #1 from Marcela MaÅlÃÅovà <mmaslano@xxxxxxxxxx> 2011-01-24 11:28:23 EST --- - rpmlint OK - package must be named according to Guidelines OK - spec file name must match the base package %{name} OK - package must meet the Packaging Guidelines OK - package must be licensed with Fedora approved license OK - license field must match actual license OK - text of the license in its own file must be included in %doc OK - sources must match the upstream source OK - package MUST successfully compile and build OK http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2739487 - architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla OK - build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires OK - handle locales properly with %find_lang macro OK - shared library files must call ldconfig in %post(un) OK - packages must NOT bundle system libraries OK - package must own all directories that it creates OK - permissions on files must be set properly OK - package must consistently use macros OK - package must contain code, or permissable content OK - large documentation must go in a -doc OK - %doc must not affect the runtime of the application OK - header files must be in a -devel package OK - static libraries must be in a -static package OK - library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel OK - devel package usually require base package OK - packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives OK - GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file OK - packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages OK rpm -qp --provides perl-Statistics-Basic-1.6602-1.fc14.noarch.rpm perl(Statistics::Basic) = 1.6602 perl(Statistics::Basic::ComputedVector) perl(Statistics::Basic::Correlation) perl(Statistics::Basic::Covariance) perl(Statistics::Basic::LeastSquareFit) perl(Statistics::Basic::Mean) perl(Statistics::Basic::Median) perl(Statistics::Basic::Mode) perl(Statistics::Basic::_OneVectorBase) perl(Statistics::Basic::StdDev) perl(Statistics::Basic::_TwoVectorBase) perl(Statistics::Basic::Variance) perl(Statistics::Basic::Vector) perl-Statistics-Basic = 1.6602-1.fc14 rpm -qp --requires perl-Statistics-Basic-1.6602-1.fc14.noarch.rpm perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.2) perl(Number::Format) >= 1.42 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <= 3.0.3-1 perl(base) perl(Carp) perl(Scalar::Util) perl(Statistics::Basic) perl(strict) perl(warnings) rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <= 3.0.3-1 Comments: * I dislike your description, but that's nothing better on upstream page. * Shouldn't be also perl(Statistics::Basic) provided without version? This could be blocker for other packages requiring any other release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review