Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=659082 --- Comment #3 from Thomas Vander Stichele <thomas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2011-01-22 15:19:57 EST --- Hi Orcan, I went through all your comments. Some of them were indeed fixed in a -3, but not all. I addressed almost all of them, except a few. Notes on the ones that need it: * patches: I commented with a link to upstream bug tracker * rpmlint: warnings are fixed, except for redland-bindings.x86_64: E: no-binary I guess a docs only package is not appreciated by rpm, but doing a noarch doc package here is a little overkill IMO. * licensing: I'm not sure what you want me to do. Where do you want me to document them ? I can ask upstream what the situation is, but that will probably take time. I don't think the package itself should block on it, what do you think ? For now I added MPLv1.0 as a license. -4 is here: http://thomas.apestaart.org/download/pkg/fedora-14-i386-updates/redland-bindings-1.0.11.1-4.fc14/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review