Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665331 --- Comment #12 from Ralf Corsepius <rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx> 2011-01-21 10:59:08 EST --- (In reply to comment #9) > I fail to understand your rant. OT for bugzilla - I will try to provide a more comprehensive answer on PM. > "yum info" or "yum search" will show you that > the package exists. I can understand problems with packages imported but never > built (though it's pretty damn easy to find those as well if you bother to look > at all), yet this isn't one of those. Only so far: This is the 3rd time in a row that this has happened to me in recent weeks. IMO, this gives a nice picture about the shape and usability of Fedora's package submission/review infrastructure. > Personally I use the convenient search box at: I normally use repoquery and build packages against all supported fedora in mock. This usually catches all such cases - Makes me wonder why it didn't in these recent cases. > http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/ > to look for pending reviews and > http://bugz.fedoraproject.org/package-name > to find information on packages that might have been created but aren't > available in yum for some reason. If you feel that's excessive bureaucracy Yes, very bluntly and somewhat exaggerated said: I feel it's a muddy swamp. > then I'm afraid there's not much anyone can do for you. As we say in German: "Only death is certain" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review