Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=646610 Paul W. Frields <stickster@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #13 from Paul W. Frields <stickster@xxxxxxxxx> 2011-01-19 19:17:52 EST --- $ rpmlint rpmbuild/SPECS/drupal6-views.spec rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/drupal6-views-2.12-1.fc14.noarch.rpm rpmbuild/SRPMS/drupal6-views-2.12-1.fc14.src.rpm drupal6-views.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided drupal-views drupal6-views.src: W: strange-permission views-6.x-2.12.tar.gz 0444L 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. Writing this for posterity... Our renaming is meant to migrate toward parallel installable drupal 6/7. It would probably be unsafe to provide drupal-views=6.x.2.12 because that would confuse (and drag in the whole D6 stack) for a user who has drupal7 installed and then mistakenly tries to 'yum install drupal-views' instead of 'yum install drupal7-views'. It's safer to ignore the first warning I think. The second warning can be safely ignored -- the FIX notation above is mistaking permissions on the tarball for permissions on the installed files. * * * $ md5sum rpmbuild/SOURCES/drupal6-views-2.12/views-6.x-2.12.tar.gz ; curl -s -o - http://ftp.drupal.org/files/projects/views-6.x-2.12.tar.gz | md5sum - 2b666d68e8566f14b85cf546d643e3e5 rpmbuild/SOURCES/drupal6-views-2.12/views-6.x-2.12.tar.gz 2b666d68e8566f14b85cf546d643e3e5 - * * * Build is successful (makes noarch on x86_64). APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review